I was developing a relatively large Drupal site lately, with over 200 modules enabled, meaning there were literally thousands of files and hundreds of directories that Drupal would end up scanning/including on every page request. Docker Desktop stores Linux containers and images in a single, large disk image file in the Mac. However, it has it's downsides: it requires extra effort to get running on Windows, requires NFS support inside the VM (not all Vagrant base boxes provide support by default), and is not actually all that fast-in comparison to native filesystem performance. Question: Q: Catalina docker NFS permission denied. Applications are open for YC Winter 2022.
Its a bit hacky due to the nature of Docker for Macs architecture, and I havent tested this since dont. Revisiting Docker for Mac's performance with NFS volumes () 2 points by rtpg 49 minutes ago hide past favorite discuss. Its a bit hacky due to the nature of Docker for Macs architecture, and I havent tested this since dont have immediate access to macOS 10.12 or higher. NFS shared folders are a decent solution, and using NFS does indeed speed up performance quite a bit (usually on the order of 20-50x for a file-heavy framework like Drupal!). Revisiting Docker for Mac's performance with NFS volumes Hacker News. Free Download For PC Windows.Need For Speed Game For PC Free Download.Great collection of free full version Need For Speed games for PC / Laptop.
The most common recommendation is to switch to NFS for shared folders. It's been a well-known fact that using native VirtualBox or VMWare shared folders is a terrible idea if you're developing a Drupal site (or some other site that uses thousands of files in hundreds of folders).
